Rubric

Find Rubric
Some Rubric (1)
Some Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
Overall Presentation & Front Matter
The overall quality of the report presentation (sort of an effort indicator) and compelling ness of the front matter (e.g. Project Background § and Planning & Design Methods §)
threshold: pts
15 pts
Full Marks
Compelling, accurate and clear presentation
12 pts
Adequate
8 pts
Incomplete
0 pts
No Marks
pts
15 pts
--
Problems & Opportunities §
Clear overview of problems present in project area and opportunities to address those problems.
threshold: pts
5 pts
Full Marks
Thorough and Compelling.
4 pts
Pretty good
Correct and complete, but not most compelling.
3 pts
Needs work
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
pts
5 pts
--
Assessment of Structural Starvation §
Is Low-Tech needed on basis of structural starvation being a problem?
threshold: pts
3 pts
Full Marks
Thorough and Compelling.
2.4 pts
Pretty good
Correct and complete, but not most compelling.
1.8 pts
Needs work
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
pts
3 pts
--
Riverscape Extent §
A clear map of valley bottom throughout the project area.
threshold: pts
5 pts
Full Marks
Complete, correctly mapped and effective cartography and description.
4 pts
Pretty good
Correct and complete, but not most compelling.
3 pts
Needs work
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
pts
5 pts
--
Identified Risks within & Adjacent to Valley Bottom §
Map all infrastructure and land use within and adjacent to riverscape, as well as immediately downstream; use risk matrix to evaluate)
threshold: pts
5 pts
Full Marks
Complete, correctly mapped and effective cartography and description as well as correctly filled out risk matrix.
4 pts
Pretty good
Correct and complete, but not most compelling.
3 pts
Needs work
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
pts
5 pts
--
Risk vs. Opportunity Assessment §
Identify and map locations where opportunities are possible and where and if risks can be reasonably mitigated. In other words, what valley bottom space is available for low-tech PBR?
threshold: pts
3 pts
Full Marks
Complete, correctly mapped and effective cartography and description.
2.4 pts
Pretty good
Correct and complete, but not most compelling.
1.8 pts
Needs work
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
pts
3 pts
--
Recovery Potential Space §
Synthesis for each project reach of proportion of valley bottom available as/for recovery potential. This should reflect the stakeholder/landowner’s current values.
threshold: pts
3 pts
Full Marks
Complete, correctly mapped and effective cartography and description.
2.4 pts
Pretty good
Correct and complete, but not most compelling.
1.8 pts
Needs work
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
pts
3 pts
--
Geomorphic Condition & Recovery Potential §
Maps (polygons) of active channel plus floodplain area of valley bottom as current vs. potential by Cluer & Throne Riverscape Stage)
threshold: pts
7 pts
Full Marks
Complete, correctly mapped and effective cartography and description.
5.6 pts
Pretty good
Correct and complete, but not most compelling.
4.2 pts
Needs work
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
pts
7 pts
--
Identification of pathways of recovery §
A description and figure (using riverscape evolution model, identify current stage(s) and target stage(s) and articulate what trajectory and geomorphic processes will be necessary to get to recovery potential).
threshold: pts
4 pts
Full Marks
Complete, correctly mapped and effective cartography and description.
3.2 pts
Pretty good
Correct and complete, but not most compelling.
2.4 pts
Needs work
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
pts
4 pts
--
Flow Regime's Ability to "Do the Work" of Restoration §
(Assessment of Flow Regime to do "geomorphic work" necessary to follow desired recovery trajectory)
threshold: pts
5 pts
Full Marks
Complete, correctly mapped and effective cartography and description.
4 pts
Pretty good
Correct and complete, but not most compelling.
3 pts
Needs work
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
pts
5 pts
--
Riparian Condition to support Process of Wood Accumulation §
Maps and description of existing and potential woody resources (riparian and upland) for processes of wood recruitment, wood transport and wood accumulation.
threshold: pts
7 pts
Full Marks
Complete, correctly mapped and effective cartography and description.
5.6 pts
Pretty good
Correct and complete, but not most compelling.
4.2 pts
Needs work
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
pts
7 pts
--
Riparian Condition to support Process of Beaver Dam Activity §
Maps and description of existing and potential woody resources (riparian and upland) for processes of beaver dam activity.
threshold: pts
8 pts
Full Marks
Complete, correctly mapped and effective cartography and description.
6.4 pts
Pretty good
Correct and complete, but not most compelling.
4.8 pts
Needs work
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
pts
8 pts
--
Project Objectives §
(revisit problem and purpose and confirm or clarify and then recast management goals as SMART objectives (see page 8-9 of Chapter 3 (Links to an external site.)) and in terms of measurable objectives and indicators that tie to riverscape health)
threshold: pts
10 pts
Full Marks
Complete, correctly mapped and effective cartography and description.
8 pts
Pretty good
Correct and complete, but not most compelling.
6 pts
Needs work
0 pts
No Marks
Missing.
pts
10 pts
--
Overall Quality of Logic
How compelling was your articulation of the current conditions, recovery potential and recasting of that opportunity into achievable project objectives?
threshold: pts
10 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
No Marks
pts
10 pts
--
Total Points: 90 out of 90