Module 6: Low-Tech Planning Assignment - Group
- Due Apr 1, 2022 by 1:30pm
- Points 50
- Submitting a website url
This assignment builds off of last week's personal planning assignment. As a group, compile a planning report using the best aspects of each persons' personal assignments. The structure of the report and rubric will be the same as last week. Your final report will have a Table of Contents (see this template Links to an external site.) and be prepared using Google Docs. You will submit your progress reports (e.g. this assignment) as Google Docs that you also share with your instructor.
Report Content
- Table of Contents
- Executive Summary
- Introduction
- Background of Birch Creek and Diamondback Wilde Ranch (i.e. synopsis of LECTURE: Watch Birch Creek - Part I)
- Problem (see slide 15 in Part 2 Lecture Links to an external site.)
- Purpose of Restoration Project
- Project Site Description & Scope (i.e. synthesis of LECTURE: Watch Birch Creek Project - Part 2, but ideally with your own maps)
- Methods - Low-Tech PBR & Conservation Planning Process (i.e. a brief review and citation of Chapter 3 and 5 of LTPBR Manual Links to an external site.)
- Planning
- Problems & Opportunities (see page 5-7 of Chapter 3
Links to an external site.)
- Broad Management Goals
- Assessment of Structural Starvation and Appropriateness of Low-Tech
- Project Objectives (revisit problem and purpose and confirm or clarify and then recast management goals as SMART objectives (see page 8-9 of Chapter 3 Links to an external site.) and in terms of measurable objectives and indicators that tie to riverscape health)
- Inventory of Resources (see page 9-13 of Chapter 3
Links to an external site.)
- Valley Bottom Mapping (refine provided VBET valley bottom and classify into active channel, active floodplain and in-accessed floodplain components)
- Identified Risks within & Adjacent to Riverscape (map all infrastructure and land use within and adjacent to riverscape, as well as immediately downstream; use risk matrix to evaluate)
- Risk vs. Opportunity Assessment (Identify and map locations where opportunities are possible and where and if risks can be reasonably mitigated. In other words, what valley bottom space is available for low-tech PBR?)
- Resource Analysis
- Assessment of Current Conditions and Recovery Potential
- Geomorphic Condition (maps (polygons) of active channel plus floodplain area of valley bottom as current vs. potential by Cluer & Throne Riverscape Stage)
- Identification of pathways of recovery (using riverscape evolution model, identify current stage(s) and target stage(s) and articulate what trajectory and geomorphic processes will be necessary to get to recovery potential).
- Flow Regimes ability to "Do the Work" of Restoration - (Assessment of Flow Regime to do "geomorphic work" necessary to follow desired recovery trajectory)
- Riparian Condition to support Process of Wood Accumulation (maps of existing and potential woody resources (riparian and upland) for processes of wood recruitment, wood transport and wood accumulation)
- Riparian Condition Capacity to support Process of Beaver Dam Activity (maps of existing and potential beaver dam activity)
- Geomorphic Condition (maps (polygons) of active channel plus floodplain area of valley bottom as current vs. potential by Cluer & Throne Riverscape Stage)
- Assessment of Current Conditions and Recovery Potential
- Problems & Opportunities (see page 5-7 of Chapter 3
Links to an external site.)
- Design (detail to follow in Design Report)
- Implementation Recommendations(detail to follow)
- Phase 1 Implementation
- Anticipated Additional Phases
- Adaptive Management Plan (detail to follow)
- Recommendations
- Summary
- References
Expectations
For the final report expect:
- Clear writing, a clear thought process, meaningful engagement with the questions posed in phase one of the CPP and proper use of citations (i.e. use Zotero)
- Clear figures with full captions (if reusing or adapting figures, cite properly)
- Consistent and effective maps Links to an external site. (whether done in ArcGIS, QGIS by hand, or Google Earth).
- You to have some questions and struggle through some of this. POST those questions to Planning Questions.
Submission
Submit as a Google Doc link (see here Links to an external site.). In addition, please manually share with me (Joe.M.Wheaton@gmail.com) and Mike (mike.clawson3@gmail.com) as editors so we can give you feedback as suggestions. See also low-tech resources.
Examples
I posted some examples of reports on just planning or including planning here Links to an external site..
Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall Presentation & Front Matter
The overall quality of the report presentation (sort of an effort indicator) and compelling ness of the front matter (e.g. Project Background § and Planning & Design Methods §)
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Problems & Opportunities §
Clear overview of problems present in project area and opportunities to address those problems.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Assessment of Structural Starvation §
Is Low-Tech needed on basis of structural starvation being a problem?
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Riverscape Extent §
A clear map of valley bottom throughout the project area.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Identified Risks within & Adjacent to Valley Bottom §
Map all infrastructure and land use within and adjacent to riverscape, as well as immediately downstream; use risk matrix to evaluate)
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Risk vs. Opportunity Assessment §
Identify and map locations where opportunities are possible and where and if risks can be reasonably mitigated. In other words, what valley bottom space is available for low-tech PBR?
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Recovery Potential Space §
Synthesis for each project reach of proportion of valley bottom available as/for recovery potential. This should reflect the stakeholder/landowner’s current values.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Geomorphic Condition & Recovery Potential §
Maps (polygons) of active channel plus floodplain area of valley bottom as current vs. potential by Cluer & Throne Riverscape Stage)
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Identification of pathways of recovery §
A description and figure (using riverscape evolution model, identify current stage(s) and target stage(s) and articulate what trajectory and geomorphic processes will be necessary to get to recovery potential).
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Flow Regime's Ability to "Do the Work" of Restoration §
(Assessment of Flow Regime to do "geomorphic work" necessary to follow desired recovery trajectory)
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Riparian Condition to support Process of Wood Accumulation §
Maps and description of existing and potential woody resources (riparian and upland) for processes of wood recruitment, wood transport and wood accumulation.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Riparian Condition to support Process of Beaver Dam Activity §
Maps and description of existing and potential woody resources (riparian and upland) for processes of beaver dam activity.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Project Objectives §
(revisit problem and purpose and confirm or clarify and then recast management goals as SMART objectives (see page 8-9 of Chapter 3 (Links to an external site.)) and in terms of measurable objectives and indicators that tie to riverscape health)
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Overall Quality of Logic
How compelling was your articulation of the current conditions, recovery potential and recasting of that opportunity into achievable project objectives?
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||
Total Points:
90
out of 90
|